Mone 24 2,045 Posted December 2, 2013 Report Share Posted December 2, 2013 Solidarietà al londinese per il multiplone perso. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marco_materazzi_23 1,305 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Canale che piacerá di sicuro ai vari Bostoniani che ci ritroviamo sul forum... http://www.youtube.com/user/YourKingIsHear666/videos Apparte tutto, gran videomaker. Un paio di video da panico. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snakepit 7,420 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 C'è qualcuno in grado di vincere a Seattle?Fattore campo fino al Superbowl.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D-GenerationLakers 7,576 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 C'è qualcuno in grado di vincere a Seattle?Fattore campo fino al Superbowl.. io avrei detto GB.. ma al momento per vederli ai playoffs serve un miracolo.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Alevin 3,519 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Grandissima partita di Wilson nella notte, pubblico come al solito fantastico a Seattle. Chiara favorita della NFC con il fattore campo dalla loro. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 According to multiple industry sources, the Red Sox have agree to a one-year deal with free agent catcher A.J. Pierzynski. The catcher, who turns 37 this month, hit .272 with a .297 OBP and .425 slugging mark along with 17 homers in 134 games for the Rangers in 2013, continuing a track record of remarkable durability — he’s played 120 or more games in 12 straight seasons. He has a career line of .283/.322/.428. Pierzynski would offer the Red Sox a left-handed complement to David Ross while signalling the almost certain end of Jarrod Saltalamacchia‘s tenure with the Red Sox. In attesa dei prospetti mi sembra una mossa strategicamente ideale, piuttosto in linea col nuovo corso bostoniano. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lakeshow 2,435 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 In attesa dei prospetti mi sembra una mossa strategicamente ideale, piuttosto in linea col nuovo corso bostoniano. Non c'è niente di strategico. Saltalamacchia non è capace a giocare catcher... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Non c'è niente di strategico. Saltalamacchia non è capace a giocare catcher... Eppure Cherington aveva detto di volerlo rinnovare, solo che non convenivano sulla durata contrattuale (minimo triennale per il giocatore, massimo biennale per la dirigenza Red Sox). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snakepit 7,420 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 DAI CAZZO! :headbang!: http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/mlb/story/_/id/10072993/brian-wilson-los-angeles-dodgers-close-deal?ex_cid=null Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Inoltre gli A's si son portati a casa il closer Johnson da Baltimora mentre i Tigers hanno firmato per 2 anni il closer Nathan: giornata piuttosto ricca, oggi. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marco_materazzi_23 1,305 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 DAI CAZZO! :headbang!: http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/mlb/story/_/id/10072993/brian-wilson-los-angeles-dodgers-close-deal?ex_cid=null E ricordiamo che eri scettico sul suo arrivo! Brianuccio! :headbang!: :headbang!: :headbang!: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snakepit 7,420 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 ho seguito il suo riscaldamento a 3m di distanza quando sono stato al Dodgers Stadium, mi ha subito convinto con lo sguardo Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D-GenerationLakers 7,576 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 la favoletta di Detroit mi pareva strana.. Wilson è perfetto per L.A. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marco_materazzi_23 1,305 Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 Minchia da brividi... Purtroppo non ho ancora ben capito come funziona con l'NCAAFQuest'anno mi son sparato un bel pó di partite comunque... Non male come ambiente. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marco_materazzi_23 1,305 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 Un alieno Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D-GenerationLakers 7,576 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 Ellsbury firma per 7 anni a circa 142 milioni di $. Wow Sarebbe anche ora di rinforzare la rotazione... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snakepit 7,420 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 bah....un altro injury prone strapagato... analisi della pazza giornata di ieri (mettete tra i preferiti, Dodger fans) http://www.mikesciosciastragicillness.com/2013/12/03/it-was-a-good-day/ So… anything happen today? The Yankees gave Jacoby Ellsbury all the money for all the years, and the Rockies signed Justin Morneau for no particular reason, and they also traded Dexter Fowler to Houston for even less of a reason, and the Padres gave up on Luke Gregerson for a platoon outfield bat, and the Marlins actually signed a major league player, and the Red Sox have to suffer A.J. Pierzynski, and the Tigers gave two years to a 39-year-old closer, and former Dodger farmhand Rob Rasmussen got traded for the 17th time, and the Rays picked up Ryan Hanigan & Heath Bell, who are now going to be good because they’re Rays, and some mystery team wants to give 3/$48m to Carlos Beltran‘s AARP years, and the Mariners really think they can get Robinson Cano and isn’t that adorable, and the A’s traded for old friend Josh Lindblom and think they can make him a starter, and that all comes after the Tigers inexplicably traded Doug Fister for party favors yesterday while the A’s went and got Jim Johnson, and… …and breathe. Seriously. After one of the most insane offseason days in baseball in a long time — who the hell decided December 3 was the new July 31? — one question I’m hearing is, “hey, where are the Dodgers in this?” The Dodgers are in the best possible place to be right now: the sidelines. While you can understand the urge to get in on the excitement, you look at what’s happening, and you think to yourself, “hey, maybe having a talented roster that doesn’t need an exceptional amount of work is a nice place to be.” It’s better than giving money to Morneau or Wil Nieves or Bell, anyway, or worrying about how much money Ellsbury just made. Really, the biggest news around the team today is the rumor that they may be close to bringing back Brian Wilson on a one-year deal (!), which if true, would be phenomenal. It would have been great at the end of the season; it’s an even better thought now. We know this isn’t going to last, of course. The “trade an outfielder” thing will never go away, and third base is still a hole, and Masahiro Tanaka still looms, and you know damn well that Edward Mujica or Fernando Rodney or someone is going to arrive for far too much money. But there’s not a single guy on that list who I really wanted the Dodgers to get other than Fister, and he barely even counts because “ugh, I wish my team had given Detroit the same deal” is something that every single other club in baseball would probably also say. Moves will be coming. Whether they happen on December 3 or 15 or January 7 doesn’t really make a whole lot of difference. For today, I’m glad it stayed quiet in our neck of the woods. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Heze 1,594 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 Un alieno È il migliore, pochi cazzi! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snakepit 7,420 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JlFAgXQzao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 È il migliore, pochi cazzi! Con chi ce l'hai? Ad Ovechkin non piace questo elemento, comunque. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Heze 1,594 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 Crosby porta l'hockey su un altro piano, poesia in movimento. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 Ellsbury firma per 7 anni a circa 142 milioni di $. Wow Sarebbe anche ora di rinforzare la rotazione... Io leggo di 153 mil$ per 7 anni. Cui vanno sommati gli 85 mil$ per 5 anni di McCann (che potrebbero diventare 100 mil$ per 6 anni). Dopodichè leggo pure di un'offerta ad Infante e della possibilità di rinnovare comunque Cano: staremo a vedere. E' esattamente il tipo di offerta che i Red Sox, stando alle parole di Cherington, non volevano assolutamente presentare; viceversa, ottengono la pick degli Yankees come compensazione, perchè se non ricordo male avevano ovviamente sottoposto la QO. Avendo sottomano le sue statistiche, l'opinione di Snake e quella di parecchi tifosi che lo accomunano a Carl Crawford, per quel poco che ho potuto imparare mi sento di poter dire di essere d'accordo con loro. La sola cosa che non mi spiego è questa: visto che quasi sempre questi contratti eterni ed eccessivamente remunerativi si rivelano dei boomerang clamorosi (da Pujols ad Hamilton passando per Crawford, appunto), perchè certe franchigie continuano a proporli? PS. Beltran pare vicino ai Royals, offerta da 48 mil$ in 3 anni. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 Crosby porta l'hockey su un altro piano, poesia in movimento. Per carità, nulla da dire su Sidney, ma attorno e dietro di lui ha pure compagni di un certo livello: lo stesso non si può dire del russo. PS. Segui/tifi/apprezzi Pittsburgh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
snakepit 7,420 Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 immagino gli Yankees siano confidenti nel liberarsi del contratto di A-Rod... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nigma Posted December 4, 2013 Report Share Posted December 4, 2013 immagino gli Yankees siano confidenti nel liberarsi del contratto di A-Rod... In che modo? Ah, inoltre: According to MLB.com, Ellsbury’s deal with the Yankees includes an option for an eighth year that could advance the deal to $169 million. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.